Introduction: Biological
control of weeds is the use of living organisms (biotic agents) to reduce the
vigour, reproductive capacity, density, or impact of weeds. The classical
strategy is based on introduction of host-specific organisms from the weed’s
native range into regions where the weed has established and become a
widespread problem. The biotic agents, after quarantine to assure host
specificity, are released into weed-infested sites and are allowed to adapt and
flourish in their new habitat over time to eventually establish a
self-perpetuating regulation of the weed infestation at acceptable levels.
Thus, classical biological control requires a time period of one to several
years to achieve adequate control while the agent population builds up to
levels to impact the weed population. (Charudattan R. 2005)
The inundative strategy attempts to overwhelm a weed infestation with
massive numbers of a biotic agent in order to attain weed control in the year
of release. In contrast to classical biological control, inundation involves
timing of agent release to coincide with weed susceptibility to the agent and
formulation of the agent to provide rapid attack of the weed host. A
development of the inundative strategy is the bioherbicide approach, which
involves application of weed pathogens in a manner similar to herbicide
applications. Since most bioherbicides have been developed using selected plant
pathogenic fungi that cause such diseases on weeds as anthracnose and rust, the
term mycoherbicide is often used in reference to these fungal preparations.
Need Bioherbicides
1. Yield losses
still occur despite of available herbicides.
2. Herbicide
resistant weed populations have developed.
3. Herbicides may have detrimental effects
on non target plants.
4. Large areas where herbicide application
not possible or not effective .
5. Damage to the environment.
6. Ground water contamination.
The
Bioherbicide Advantage
1.
Bioherbicide can be readily integrated
into weed management systems.
2.
Bioherbicides are often compatible with synthetic herbicides.
3.
Organically acceptable.
4. Low
maintenance and management.
5. Effective
area not limited.
Ideal
Characteristics of a Bioherbicide
- Produce abundant and durable inoculum in culture.
- Target specific.
- Genetically stable.
- Capable of killing a significant portion of the weed population under a variety of environmental conditions. (weed densities)
Important
Bioherbicides being produced and used commercially
Trade name
|
Mycoherbicide
|
Country
|
Weed controlled
|
DEVINE
|
Phytophthora palmivora: it is a liquid suspension &
cause root rot in the weed.
|
-
|
Strangle vine (Morrenia odorata)
in citrus orchard
|
COLLEGO
|
Collectotrichum gloesporiodes f.sp. Aeschynomene.: it is a
wettable powder and causes stem and leaf blight in the weed.
|
USA
|
Northern join vetch (Aeschynomone
spp.)
|
BIPOLARIS
|
Bipolalaris sorghicola: it is a liquid
suspension
|
-
|
Johnson grass
(sorghum halepense)
|
BIOLOPHOS
|
A microbial toxin produced as fermentation
product of streptomyces hygroscopicus
|
-
|
Non specific general
vegetation
|
BIOMAL
|
Wettable powder of Collectotrichum
gloesporiodes f.sp. Malvae
|
USA
|
Malvapusilla
|
Dr. BIOSEDGE
|
Puccinia canooliculata
|
-
|
Cyperus esculentus
|
ABG-5003
|
Wettable powder cercospora
rodmanii
|
USA
|
Water hyacinth (Eichornia
crassipes)
|
WELCO
|
Collectrichum coccodes
|
USA
|
Abutilon theophrasti
|
LUBOA
|
Collectotrichum f.sp. cuscutae
|
CHINA
|
Cuscuta spp.
|
CASST
|
Alternaria cassiae
|
USA
|
Cassia obtusifolia
|
Steps in Bioherbicide Development
The
development of Bioherbicide involves three major phases:
A)
Discovery
The discovery
phase involves Collection of diseased plant material:
1. Isolation of the causal organism
2. Identification of the pathogen, culture of the
pathogen on artificial media
3. Maintenance of the pathogen cultures in short-term and long-term
storage
B) Development
The
development phase involves:
1. Determination of optimum conditions
for spore production
2. Determination of optimum conditions for infection and disease
development
3. Determination of host range and explanation of mechanism of action of
the pathogen
C) Deployment
Involves close collaboration
between non industrial and industrial
sectors through
1.
Formulation
2.
Scale-up
3.
Field
evaluation
4.
Marketing
stages of commercialization of new bioherbicide product
Some Commercial Mycoherbicides in Use Abroad
Product
|
Content
|
Weed
controlled
|
De-vine
|
A liquid
suspension of fungal spores of Phytophthora palmivora Butler. It
causes root rot in the weed
|
Strangle
vine (Morrenia odorata) in
citrus orchards
|
Collego
|
Wettable
powder containing fungal spores of Colletotrichum gloesporiodes Penzig
& Sacc. Sp. Aeschynomene
|
Northern
joint vetch (Aeschynomone sp) in rice fields. The bioherbicide causes
stem and leaf blight in the weed
|
Bipolaris
|
A
suspension of fungal spores of Bipolaris sorghicola
|
Johnson
grass (Sorghum halepense)
|
Biolophos
|
A microbial
toxin produced as fermentation product of Streptomyces hygroscopicus
|
Non-specific,
general vegetation
|
References
Charudattan
R. (2005): Use of plant pathogens as bioherbicides to manage weeds in
horticultural crops. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 118:208-214.
Daniel K.
R., T. A. Bewick, L. K. Binning and W.
R. Stevenson. (1976) Control of weeds
with a mixture of three fungal pathogens with restricted host ranges.
Biological Control 22:246-255.
Gupta, J.
M. (2001). Principles of biological weed control with micro-organisms.
Horticulture Science. 32(2):201-205.
Johnson W.
S., J. B. Barton, S. D. Hethering and T.S. Bellows (1996). Use of plants
pathogens in weed control. Handbook of Biological Control. Pages 891-918.
Robert J.
K., (2005): The role of bioherbicides in weed management Biopesticides
International. 1(3, 4): 127-141.
Smith S.
R., E. Rosskoff, John Wiilley (1986) Status of weed control with plant
pathogens.The Biological control of Weeds Book. 3: 34-43
Article
compiled by
Pravin B. Berad (Ph.D.
Scholar)
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola
(M.S.)
No comments:
Post a Comment