Showing posts with label English Articles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English Articles. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 December 2016

Biodegradation of excessive Pesticides and Herbicides by Soil Microorganisms



          Pesticides are the chemical substances that kill pests and herbicides are the chemicals that kill weeds. In the context of soil, pests are fungi, bacteria insects, worms, and nematodes etc. that cause damage to field crops. Thus, in broad sense pesticides are insecticides, fungicides, bactericides, herbicides and nematicides that are used to control or inhibit plant diseases and insect pests.
1. Effects of pesticides: Pesticides reaching the soil in significant quantities have direct effect on soil microbiological aspects, which in turn influence plant growth.
Some of the most important effects caused by pesticides are:
(1) alterations in ecological balance of the soil microflora, (2) continued application of large quantities of pesticides may cause everlasting changes in the soil microflora, (3) adverse effect on soil fertility and crop productivity, (4) inhibition of N2 fixing soil microorganisms such as Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum etc. and cellulolytic and phosphate solubilizing microorganisms, (5) suppression of nitrifying bacteria, Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter by soil fumigants ethylene bromide, Telone, and vapam have also been reported, (6) alterations in nitrogen balance of the soil, (7) interference with ammonification in soil, (8) adverse effect on mycorrhizal symbioses in plants and nodulation in legumes, and (9) alterations in the rhizosphere microflora, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
2. Persistence of pesticides in soil: How long an insecticide, fungicide, or herbicide persists in soil is of great importance in relation to pest management and environmental pollution. Persistence of pesticides in soil for longer period is undesirable because of the reasons: a) accumulation of the chemicals in soil to highly toxic levels, b) may be assimilated by the plants and get accumulated in edible plant products, c) accumulation in the edible portions of the root crops, d) to be get eroded with soil particles and may enter into the water streams, and finally leading to the soil, water and air pollutions. The effective persistence of pesticides in soil varies from a week to several years depending upon structure and properties of the constituents in the pesticide and availability of moisture in soil. For instance, the highly toxic phosphates do not persist for more than three months while chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides (eg. DOT, aldrin, chlordane etc) are known to persist at least for 4-5 years and some times more than 15 years.
From the agricultural point of view, longer persistence of pesticides leading to accumulation of residues in soil may result into the increased absorption of such toxic chemicals by plants to the level at which the consumption of plant products may prove deleterious / hazardous to human beings as well as livestock's. There is a chronic problem of agricultural chemicals, having entered in food chain at highly inadmissible levels in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and several other developing countries in the world. For example, intensive use of DDT to control insect pests and mercurial fungicides to control diseases in agriculture had been known to persist for longer period and thereby got accumulated in the food chain leading to food contamination and health hazards. Therefore, DDT and mercurial fungicides has been, banned to use in agriculture as well as in public health department.
3. Biodegradation of Pesticides in Soil: Pesticides reaching to the soil are acted upon by several physical, chemical, and biological forces. However, physical and chemical forces are acting upon/degrading the pesticides to some extent, microorganism’s plays major role in the degradation of pesticides. Many soil microorganisms have the ability to act upon pesticides and convert them into simpler non-toxic compounds. This process of degradation of pesticides and conversion into non-toxic compounds by microorganisms is known as “biodegradation”. Not all pesticides reaching to the soil are biodegradable and such chemicals that show complete resistance to biodegradation are called “recalcitrant”.
The chemical reactions leading to biodegradation of pesticides fall into several broad categories which are discussed in brief in the following paragraphs.
a) Detoxification: Conversion of the pesticide molecule to a non-toxic compound. Since a single chance in the side chain of a complex molecule may render the chemical non-toxic.
b) Degradation: The breaking down / transformation of a complex substrate into simpler products leading finally to mineralization. e.g. Thirum (fungicide) is degraded by a strain of Pseudomonas and the degradation products are dimethlamine, proteins, sulpholipaids, etc.
C. Conjugation (complex formation or addition reaction): In which an organism make the substrate more complex or combines the pesticide with cell metabolites. Conjugation or the formation of addition product is accomplished by those organisms catalyzing the reaction of addition of an amino acid, organic acid or methyl crown to the substrate, for e.g., in the microbial metabolism of sodium dimethly dithiocarbamate, the organism combines the fungicide with an amino acid molecule normally present in the cell and thereby inactivate the pesticides/chemical.
d) Activation: It is the conversion of non-toxic substrate into a toxic molecule, for eg. Herbicide, 4-butyric acid (2, 4-D B) and the insecticide Phorate are transformed and activated microbiologically in soil to give metabolites that are toxic to weeds and insects.
e) Changing the spectrum of toxicity: Some fungicides/pesticides are designed to control one particular group of organisms / pests, but they are metabolized to yield products inhibitory to entirely dissimilar groups of organisms, for e.g. the fungicide PCNB fungicide is converted in soil to chlorinated benzoic acids that kill plants.
Biodegradation of pesticides / herbicides is greatly influenced by the soil factors like moisture, temperature, PH and organic matter content, in addition to microbial population and pesticide solubility. Optimum temperature, moisture and organic matter in soil provide congenial environment for the break down or retention of any pesticide added in the soil. Most of the organic pesticides degrade within a short period (3-6 months) under tropical conditions. Metabolic activities of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes have the significant role in the degradation of pesticides.
4. Criteria for Bioremediation / Biodegradation: For successful biodegradation of pesticide in soil, following aspects must be taken into consideration. i) Organisms must have necessary catabolic activity required for degradation of contaminant at fast rate to bring down the concentration of contaminant, ii) the target contaminant must be bioavailability, iii) soil conditions must be congenial for microbial /plant growth and enzymatic activity and iv) cost of bioremediation must be less than other technologies of removal of contaminants.
According to Gales (1952) principal of microbial infallibility, for every naturally occurring organic compound there is a microbe / enzyme system capable its degradation.

Article compiled by Mr. Amol Vijay Shitole (Ph.D. Scholar)
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.)

Rhizosphere in relation to Plant Pathogens



          Plant root exudates influence pathogenic fungi, bacteria and nematodes in various ways. The effect may be in the form of attraction of fungal zoospores, or bacterial cells towards the roots; stimulation of germination of dormant spores and hatching of cysts of nematodes. Root exudates may contain inhibitory substances preventing the establishment of pathogens. The balance between the rhizosphere microflora and plant pathogens and soil microflora and plant pathogens is important in host-pathogenic relationship. In this context, the biochemical qualities of root exudates and the presence of antagonistic micro-organisms plays an important role in the proliferation and survival of root infecting pathogens in soil either through soil fungi stasis, inhibition or antibiosis of pathogens in the rhizosphere.
          Some of the most common interactions between plant roots and plant pathogenic microorganisms in the rhizosphere are discussed herewith.
A. Zoospore attraction: Amino acids, organic acids and sugars in the root exudates stimulate the movement and attraction of zoospores towards root of the plants.
Eg.  Attraction of zoospores has been reported in Phytophthora citrophthora (Citrus roots), P. parasitica (tobacco roots) and Pythium aphanidermatum (pea root).
B. Spore germination: The spores or conidia of many pathogenic fungi such as Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Sclerotium, Pythium, Phytophthora etc. have been stimulated to germinate by the root exudates of susceptible cultivars of the host plants. There are some reports on the selective stimulation of Fusarium, Pseudomonas and root infecting nematodes in the rhizosphere region of the respective susceptible hosts. This stimulus to germination is especially important to those plant pathogens which are not vigorous competitors and remain in resting stage due to shortage of nutrients or fungistasis.
As a rule, germination and subsequent hyphal development are promoted by non host species and also by both susceptible and resistant cultivars of the host plants. The quantity and quality of microorganisms present in the rhizosphere of disease resistant crop varieties are significantly different from those of susceptible varieties.
C. Changes in morphology and physiology of host plant: Changes in the physiology and morphology of host plant influence the rhizosphere microflora through root exudations. Hence, significant changes in the rhizosphere microflora of diseased plants were reported which are attributed to the nature and severity of the disease. Systemic virus diseases cause marked changes in the plant morphology and physiology to drastically alter the rhizosphere microflora.
D. Increase in antagonist’s activity: Root exudates provide a food base for the growth of antagonistic organisms which plays an important role in controlling / suppressing some of the soil borne plant pathogens. Generally, rhizosphere of the resistant plant varieties harboure moer number of Streptomyces and Trichoderma than that of susceptible varieties. For example in the rhizosphere of pigeon pea varieties resistant to Fusarium udum, the population of Streptomyces was found more which inhibited the growth of the pathogen. High density of Trichoderma viride in the rhizosphere of Tomato varieties resistant to Verticillium wilt has been reported with its ability to reduce the severity of wilt in susceptible plants.
E. Inhibition of pathogen: Root exudates containing toxic substances such as glycosides and hydrocyanic acid may inhibit the growth of pathogens in the rhizosphere. It has been reported that root exudates from resistant varieties of Flax (eg. Bison) excrete a glucoside which on hydrolysis produces hydrocyanic acid that inhibits Fusarium oxysporum, the flax root pathogen. Exudates of resistant pea reduce the germination of spores of Fusarium oxysporum.
In this light, the rhizosphere may be considered as a microbiological buffer zone in which the microflora serves to protect the plants against the attack of the pathogens.
F. Attraction of bacteria and nematodes: Root exudates attracts phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere for example Agrobacterium tumefaciens have been reported to be attracted to the roots of the host plants like peas, maize, onion, tobacco, tomato and cucumber.
Host root exudates also influence phytopathogenic nematodes in two ways: (i) though stimulation of egg-hatching process and (ii) attraction of larvae towards plant roots.

Article compiled by Mr. Amol Vijay Shitole (Ph.D. Scholar)
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.)

Nanomaterials for management of Plant Diseases



              Plant pathologists made a late start in harnessing the benefits of nanomaterials for management of plant pathogens. There have been some exciting results obtained especially in plant disease management aspects concerning fungi, bacteria and flowering plant parasite by developing nanoparticles of different metals, pesticides and growth promoter
Nanosized silver:
              Silver (Ag) is known to have antimicrobial activity both in ionic or nanoparticle forms. The powerful antimicrobial effect of silver especially in unicellular microorganisms is believed to be brought about by enzyme inactivation (Kim et al., 1998). Antifungal effect of nano silver colloids (average diameter of 1.5 nm) was studied against the powdery mildew pathogen of rose caused by Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae. Silver is now an accepted agrochemical replacement’ and maximum no. of patents are filed for ‘nano silver’ for preservation and treatment of diseases in agriculture field (Sharon et al., 2010).
Nanosized silica-silver:
              Silica is well known to enhance stress resistance to plants including plant diseases through promotion of plant physiological activity and growth (Kanto et al., 2004) but it has no direct antimicrobial effect. It was found that smaller size of silver nanoparticles was more effective against fungi. Most of the bacteria tested were inhibited completely with only 100 ppm of silica-silver nanoparticles. When nanosized silica-silver particles were applied in field condition to control powdery mildew diseases of cucurbits, 100% control was achieved after 3 weeks (Park et al., 2006). Nanosized silica silver inhibited the growth and development of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles:
              These are silica (SiO2) nanoparticles with regularly arranged pores which increase the surface area of the nanoparticles. Targeted delivery of chemicals and DNA can be made by mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Wang et al., 2002). It offers the possibility of genetic manipulation of plants, delivery of chemicals at targeted site in plant, improve efficiency of used chemical and reduce the chemical residue problem to the minimum. Nano-copper: Nano-copper was reported to be highly effective in controlling bacterial diseases viz. bacterial blight of rice (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) and leaf spot of mung (X. campestris pv. phaseoli) (Gogoi et al., 2009).
Nano-iron:
              Movement and behaviour of nanoparticles and their curative affect is being studied more extensively involving humans. Similar study to deliver the nanoparticles in the targeted site of a diseased plant has been done by Corredor et al. (2009). They applied iron nanoparticles coated with carbon to pumpkin plants for treating specific plant part that is infected.
Carbon nanotubes:
              Carbon nanotubes have shown growth enhancing effect on tomato when grown in soil containing carbon nanotubes (Khodakovsky et al., 2000). It is believed that carbon nanotubes entered the germinating tomato seeds thus facilitating water uptake and plant growth.
Pesticide nanoformulations
Manufacturers are developing nanoformulations of existing fungicidal compounds by reducing the size of active ingredients to nanoscale and also by nanoencapsulating them.
Syngenta have developed fungicide formulation containing nanoparticles for example Banner MAXX Fungicide (active ingredient propiconazole), Apron MAXX (active ingredient fludioxonil) RFC for seed treatments. Similarly, cyclopropyl derivative of cyclohexenone (Primo MAXX) has been developed as plant growth regulator but it helps the plant in withstanding abiotic as well as biotic stresses including plant pathogens (Gogoi et al., 2009)
              A product of nanotechnology research in agriculture with the name of ‘Nano-Gro’ has been launched (Agro Nanotechnology Corp., Florida, http://www.agronano.com). Plants treated with ‘Nano-Gro’ show an average yield increase of 20% with maximum of 50% in case of grain yield of sunflower; increase in protein and sugar content by about 10% and plants can fight various diseases. The product is certified to be an organic one and harmless to plants and soil. ‘Nano Green’ a product prepared by mixing several bio-based chemicals was reported to eliminate blast disease (Magnaporthe grisea) from infected rice plant. The test was conducted in University of Georgia and the product was found to outperform any other pesticide or fungicides currently in use in agriculture (Gogoi et al., 2009).
Conclusion:
1. By using Nanotechnology and Genetic engineering techniques on hard core basis we can arrest the loses caused due to plant diseases.
2. Transfer of desirable genes for disease resistance can achieved through Nanobiotechnology.
REFERENCES:
Banik, S. and P. Sharma, 2011. Plant Pathology in era of nanotechnology. Indian           Phytopathol, 64(2) :120-127.
M. R. Khan and T. F Rizvi, 2014.  Nanotechnology: Scope and application in Plant Disease           Management, Pl. Pathol. J. 13(3) : 214-231

Article compiled by Mr. Amol Vijay Shitole (Ph.D. Scholar)
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.)

Climate change and Plant Diseases



Climate change is a long-term change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns over periods of time that range from decades to millions of years. Climate change may be limited to a specific region, or may occur across the whole Earth. IMPACT ON PLANT PATHOSYSTEMS
It includes following heads...
PHYSIOLOGY OF HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION
ELEVATED CO2
          Increases in leaf area and duration, leaf thickness, branching, tillering, stem and root length and dry weight are well-known effects of increased CO2 on many plants elevated CO2 would increase canopy size and density, resulting in a greater biomass of high nutritional quality.
          When combined with increased canopy humidity, this is likely to promote foliar diseases such as rusts, powdery mildews, leaf spots, and blights. The decomposition of plant litter is an important factor in nutrient cycling and in the saprophytic survival of many pathogens.
  • Increased C: N ratio of litter is a consequence of plant growth under elevated CO2. Evidence from pot and field studies indicates that decomposition of high-CO2 litter occurs at a slower rate.
  • Increased plant biomass, slower decomposition of litter and higher winter temperature could increase pathogen survival on overwintering crop residues and increase the amount of initial inoculum available to infect subsequent crops.
ELEVATED TEMPERATURE
          Increases in temperature can modify host physiology and resistance. Considerable information is available on heat-induced susceptibility and temperature-sensitive genes.
  • For example, a rise in temperature above 20±C can inactivate temperature-sensitive resistance to stem rust in oat cultivars with Pg3 and Pg4 genes.
  • In contrast, lignifications of cell walls increased in forage species at higher temperatures (165) to enhance resistance to fungal pathogens. Impacts would, therefore, depend on the nature of the host-pathogen interactions and the mechanism of resistance.
ELEVATED MOISTURE
          Moisture can impact both host plants and pathogen organisms in various ways. Some pathogens such as apple scab, late blight, and several vegetable root pathogens are more likely to infect plants with increased moisture – forecast models for these diseases are based on leaf wetness, relative humidity and precipitation measurements.
  • Other pathogens like the powdery mildew species tend to thrive in conditions with lower (but not low) moisture.
  • More frequent and extreme precipitation events that are predicted by some climate change models could result in more and longer periods with favourable pathogen environments.
  • Host crops with canopy size limited by lack of moisture might no longer be so limited and may produce canopies that hold moisture in the form of leaf wetness or high canopy relative humidity for longer periods, thus increasing the risk from pathogen infection.
IMPACTS ON MAJOR GROUPS OF PLANT PATHOGENS
FUNGAL DISEASES
          Soil borne fungi survive in soil by producing structures such as sclerotia or thick-walled spores (e.g., chlamydospores or oospores).  Soil borne fungi include species of Botrytis, Fusarium, Phytophthora, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Sclerotinia, Sclerotium, and Verticillium.
          Survival structures produced by soil borne fungi are persistent and can survive for years in soil; therefore, the milder winters and reduced soil moisture with climate change are not expected to significantly affect their survival.
BACTERIAL DISEASES
          Most bacterial diseases are considered polycyclic. Bacteria are spread to their host plants mainly by water, usually in the form of rain splash, and insects. Moisture is the most important factor in the development of bacterial diseases. Abundant moisture increases multiplication, oozing, and spread of bacteria. In humid, wet conditions, infected plant tissues can exude masses of bacteria that are spread from host to host by rain splash and insects. Therefore, the warmer drier summers expected with climate change should limit bacterial diseases. However, bacteria often enter their plant hosts through wounds and the expected increase in frequency and intensity of summer storms with high winds, rain, and hail will increase wounding of plants and provide moisture for the spread of bacteria.
VIRAL DISEASES
          Vectors are important in spread of viral diseases. Insects such as aphids are expected to have increased survival with milder winter temperatures, and higher spring and summer temperatures will increase their development and reproductive rates and lead to more severe disease.  Milder winters are also expected to increase survival of alternate weed hosts of viruses.
          Increases in frequency and intensity of summer storms with high winds, rain, and hail will increase wounding of plants and result in increased transmission of viruses by mechanical means. Therefore, with predicted changes in climate, viral diseases of plants are expected to increase in importance.
Conclusions: 
• Plant disease has a major impact on agricultural and natural systems
• Current strategies for management need to be maintained and improved, even if the climate did not change.
• Climate change will increase some disease risks and decrease others.
• The effects of climate change will be most important when thresholds and interactions occur to produce unanticipated large responses
• Systems may change more rapidly than in the past, requiring more research and policy attention
Referances 
M. Pautasso & T. F. Döring & M. Garbelotto & L. Pellis & M. J. JegerEur, 2012. Impacts of climate change on plant diseases—opinions and trends, J. Plant Pathol DOI 10.1007/s10658-012-9936-1.
H. R. Gautam*, M. L. Bhardwaj and Rohitashw Kumar CURRENT SCIENCE, 2013. Climate change and its impact on plant diseases, 105(12) 1685-1691.

Article compiled by Mr. Amol Vijay Shitole (Ph.D. Scholar)
Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.)